Narendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48515 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -AKBARNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Narendra Prasad Yadav Son of Late Dhaneshwar Yadav, R/o VillageBaruei, P.S.- Kharagpur, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Indu Bala Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Akbarnagar P.S.Case No.19 of 2017 for the offences punishable under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping and since then he is still traceless. He is father-in-law. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been implicated in the case and apart from that there is nothing available on the record to show complicity of the petitioner in this case and the petitioner is in custody since 10.4.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also and the learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail on the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48515 of 2017 (3) dt.20-11-2017 2/2 ground that it is the petitioner who has called the deceased and since then he is traceless.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Akbarnagar P.S.Case No.19 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T