Patna High CourtCWJC/22566/2011disposed

Chandra Shekhar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-29Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.22566 of 2011 dt.29-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22566 of 2011 =========================================================== Chandra Shekhar Yadav Son Of Bhola Pd.Yadav Sakra,Ps,Gadhpura,Distt.Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate,Begusarai.

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner,Begusarai.

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer,Bakhri under the District Begusarai.

5. The Block Development Officer, Gadhpura Block under the District Begusarai.

6. The Marketing Officer Gadhpura Block under the District Begusarai.

7. The Prakhand Supply Officer,Gadhpura Block Under The District-Begusarai. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. BINOD KUMAR AMBASTHA For the Respondent/s : Mr. RADHIKA RAMAN GP23 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the letter No. 492 dated 03.03.2011 and letter no. 567 dated 15.03.2011 issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner, Begusarai, by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of

Patna High Court CWJC No.22566 of 2011 dt.29-10-2018 such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 02.11.2018 Transmission Date NA