Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58083 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2022 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== CHANDAN YADAV SON OF PRAYAG YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - JUNGAL TOLA, P.S. - RUPAULI (MOHANPUR), DISTRICT - PURNEA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhola Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Rupali (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation, the accused persons including the petitioner came there at the door of the informant and started abusing and assaulting them. On protest, the accused persons including the petitioner fired shot on the informant and fled away.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner is not the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58083 of 2024(2) dt.22-08-2024 2/2 assailant. None has suffered any kind of injuries. Nothing was recovered from possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is under custody since 19.07.2023.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner has got 11 criminal antecedents.

6. It appears that in present case, none has suffered any kind of injuries and so merely because of having criminal antecedent of eleven cases in his credit, the petitioner's prayer for grant of bail cannot be refused.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnea in connection with Rupali (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2022, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T