Bhulan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51456 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2019 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== BHULAN SINGH Son of Kashi Nath Singh Resident of Village - Sahuka, P.S.- Ramgarh, Dist.- Kaimur at Bhabua. ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is the eye witness of the occurrence and he has clearly stated that it was co-accused Dhiraj Singh who fired at the victim Sonu Seth who received fire arm injuries and died in course of treatment. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and no role has been attributed to the petitioner.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51456 of 2019(3) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Kaimur at Bhabua in Ramgarh Police Station Case No. 32 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tempers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T