Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33340/2017dismissed

Yogendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33340 of 2017 (3) dt.02-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33340 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2016 Thana -ROSHANGAANJ District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Yogendra Paswan, S/o Naresh Paswan, R/o Vill- Rewada, P.S.- Barachattey, Dist- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raushanganj (Bankey Bazar) P.S. Case No. 147 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused is of looting cash of Rs. 84, 877/- on the point of pistol from the petrol pump.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case by the police only on the basis of suspicion as the petitioner on the alleged date of occurrence has gone to market for some purchasing but as he has no helmet and driving license, he was trying to escape but met with an accident and was caught by the police. Further petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33340 of 2017 (3) dt.02-08-2017 has been in judicial custody since 30.10.2016. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner was caught on chase by the police after committing the loot.

Having heard both sides, considering the fact and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, his application for regular bail is, accordingly, rejected.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of nine months. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T