Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhyamik Vidhyalaya Makhpa, v. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19544 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhyamik Vidhyalaya Makhpa, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya through its Secretary Dinesh Mishra, Male, aged about 68 years, Son of Late Sri Krishna Mishra, Resident of Village - Makhpa, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya.

2.

Sandhya Mishra, Son of Sri Ashutosh Mishra, Resident of Village - Makhpa, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya, At present Head Mistress in Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhyamik Vidhyalaya Makhpa, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna, through its Secretary. 2.

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Secretary Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Controller of Examination, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suresh Kumar Ishwar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Satyam Shivam Sundaram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have filed a representation before the respondent no.3 but till date it has not been disposed of.

4.

Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 along with a copy of this order and other documents in support of their claim within two weeks. The respondent no.3 shall dispose of the representation of the petitioners within a period of ten weeks' after affording an

Patna High Court CWJC No.19544 of 2021(3) dt.15-05-2024 2/2 opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass a speaking and reasoned order.

5.

It is made clear that the respondent no.3 shall be held responsible non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T