Babloo Paswan @ Dabloo Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35032 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2017 Thana -DIGHA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Babloo Paswan @ Dabloo Paswan, son of Late Ram Ekbal Paswan, resident of Mohalla- Ramji Chak Digha, Police Station- Digha, DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Digha P.S.Case No.52 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that the case is under Section 302 of the IPC.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though he has been named in the F.I.R. only on the basis of suspicion as there was some enmity from before with respect to payment of some money, however neither he was in company of the petitioner earlier nor any other incriminating material has come against the petitioner and he is in custody for more than five months.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35032 of 2017 (4) dt.30-08-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna in connection with Digha P.S.Case No.52 of 2017.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T