Deepak Kumar Sah @ Deepak Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58827 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Sah @ Deepak Sah son of Baij Nath Sah @ Chhotu Sah Village- Khajauli Maniyarva Bazar Inarwa Ps- Khajauli Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-10-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khajauli P. S. Case No.04 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 20-5-2024. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the petitioner is not alleged to have fired causing firearm injury to the injured rather allegation of causing firearm injury to the injured is against Dilip.

4.

The learned APP, Shri. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, opposes the regular bail application and submits that though

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58827 of 2024(2) dt.04-10-2024 2/2 petitioner is not alleged to have fired causing firearm injury, but then he was present at the place of the occurrence and he has antecedent of six cases. It is also submitted that it does not appear that charges have been framed or else it would have been pleaded in the anticipatory bail application. It is also submitted that if the privilege of bail is granted to the petitioner, then the petitioner may abscond.

5.

At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the regular bail application with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

6.

Permission is accorded.

7.

Accordingly, the present regular bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T