Putul Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44220 of 2018 Arising out of P.S. Case No.-511 Year-2017 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ======================================================

1. Putul Rai, Son of Ramjee Rai,

2. Pawan Kumar Rai, Son of Harendra Rai,

3. Surendra Rai, Son of Dhrup Rai, All resident of VillageAjayabganj, Naya Basti, Loha Tola, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No.511 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 307, 386, 379, 504/114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is that on the order of petitioner no.3, they have assaulted and petitioner no.2 snatched Rs.2 lacs, which was kept in the pocket of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is a land dispute between the petitioners and informant and there is case and counter case between them and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44220 of 2018(2) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 all injuries are simple in nature and the allegation of snatching of Rs.2 lacs is an ornamental in nature.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 511 of 2017, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XIth, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/-sunil U T