← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16893/2008dismissed

Amlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-18Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.16893 of 2008 (2) dt.18-09-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16893 of 2008 ====================================================== Amlesh Kumar, son of Sri Anil Kumar, resident of Gaya, Mohalla- Railway Station Road, G.R.P. Colony, Police Station-Kotwali, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Director- General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Home Commissioner, Bihar, Patna

4. The Principal Secretary, Personnel & Administrative Reforms Department, Patna.

5. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Patna-14

6. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.14. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For Staff Selection Commission: Mr. S.S. Sunderam For the State : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2015 No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsels for the State and for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission are present.

It is pointed out by learned counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission that with respect to the same examination process for the appointment of Sub-Inspector of Police the matter had come up before this Court and ultimately on the basis of re-evaluation done as per the direction given by this Court by order dated 25.11.2008 passed in CWJC No. 9155/2008 (Jay Shanker Prasad & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.): 2008

(4) PLJR 825 and its analogous cases holding that the errors in

Patna High Court CWJC No.16893 of 2008 (2) dt.18-09-2015 the examinations giving rise to the lis in those writ applications having been corrected, the writ applications were disposed of in terms of the same.

It is further submitted by learned counsel for the Commission that the said order was not challenged and has attained finality.

In the foresaid view of the matter, the writ application is dismissed as not pressed.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) V.P.Sinha/- U