Sarjun Mistri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45940 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -160 Year- 2018 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Sarjun Mistri son of Late Rajdeo Mistri, resident of Village- Jay Bigha, Police Station- Makhdumpur in the district of Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mustaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Makhdumpur P.S.Cae No.160 of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by rod to the informant causing injury to the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the injury is simple in nature and there is land dispute between the parties.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45940 of 2018 (2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S.Case no.160 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T