Patna High CourtMJC/3383/2014disposed

Prabhu Narayan Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-01-07Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3383 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21571 of 2012 ====================================================== Prabhu Narayan Das S/o Late Noke Lal Das, Village- Kalapatti Barahi, P.O. Kalapatti, District- Madhubani (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Rameshwar Singh, Principal Secretary, Finance Deptt. Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, Secretary, Water Resource Deptt., Bihar, Patna

4. Sri Rajeshwar Dayal, Engineer-in-Chief (North), Water Resource Deptt. Patna

5. Md. Sohail, Joint Secretary, Water Resource Deptt., Bihar, Patna

6. Sri Jiwaneshwar Rajak, Dy. Secretary, Water Resource Deptt., Bihar, Patna

7. Smt. Meera Vanshsikar, Under Secretary-cum- IC Public Grievance Cell, Water Resource Deptt., Bihar, Patna

8. Sri Indrajeet Saxena, Chief Engineer, Water Resource Deptt., Bihar, Patna

9. Sri Arvind Kumar, Superintending Engineer, Western Koshi Canal Circle, Jhanjharpur

10. Sri Shailesh Kumar Singh, Executive Engineer, Western Koshi Canal Circle, Khutauna

11. Sri Kumar Ravi, District Magistrate, Darbhanga

12. Sri Ram Balak Kumar, District Account Officer, Darbhanga

13. Sri Sanjay Kumar, Accountant General, Bihar, Patna

14. Smt. Vandana Kini, Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Himanshu Kumar, AC to GA 1 Mr Uday Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 07-01-2015 Petitioner has been granted second time bound promotion as well as MACP. He makes a grievance that he is entitled to increment after fixing his grade pay and pay revision in terms of MACP which the respondents are refusing to give or

Patna High Court MJC No.3383 of 2014 (4) dt.07-01-2015 2/2 sanction on a wrong interpretation of the circular. Let the petitioner agitate the matter before the competent authority, who have an obligation to decide and pass an appropriate order within a reasonable time frame.

Contempt application is otherwise dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U