Naresh Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45681 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Naresh Mahto, son of Late Prabhu Mahto
2. Samtolia Devi, wife of Naresh Mahto Both are resident of VillageFulahar, P.S.- Harlakhi, District- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Harlakhi P.S.Case No. 50 of 2018/ G.R. No. 176 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 324, 341, 354 and 504 of 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is that when the goat of the informant was grazing the leaves of the Mango and Mahua, the petitioners assaulted by the iron rod on the head of the informant, causing injury on her head and she became unconscious.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been implicated in this case and more over the injuries are simple in nature, which appears from para-8 of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45681 of 2018 (2) dt.06-08-2018 2/2 petition and the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named, surrender be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Benipatti in connection with Harlakhi P.S.Case No. 50 of 2018/ G.R. No. 176 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T