Pradeep Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45748 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Pradeep Yadav, Son of Shivnandan Yadav @ Khekhar Yadav, Resident of Village- Parihari Tola, Ward No.03, Police Station- Kumar Khand, District- Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kumarkhand (Belari Out Post) P.S.Case no.06 of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted by spade to the informant on head.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the impugned order itself shows that the injuries are simple though it is said that it was dangerous to life. Furthermore, there is land dispute between the parties.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45748 of 2018 (2) dt.07-08-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Madhepura in connection with Kumarkhand (Belari Out Post) P.S.Case no.06 of 2018 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T