Zamila Begum And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49398 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2016 Thana -DIGHALBANK District- KISANGANJ ======================================================
1. Zamila Begum wife of Late Md. Kalu
2. Nahida wife of Hasim resident of Village- Baniya Dangi, P.S. Dighal Bank, District Kishanganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Dighalbank P.S. Case No. 112 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is of causing death of the sister of the informant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, who are the mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased and they have falsely been implicated in this case and there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners and the husband of the deceased has already been acquitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49398 of 2018 (2) dt.28-08-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Dighalbank P.S.Case No. 112 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T