Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59448 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2023 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== SANJEET KUMAR son of Jay Jay Ram Mahto Village- Kaithma PsMuffasil Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sarvottam Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the Grand-son of the informant and disappeared his dead body.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Mohan Kumar and his self

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59448 of 2023(2) dt.08-09-2023 2/2 confession before the police. There is no consistent evidence and no eye-witness of the alleged occurrence to show his complicity in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 01.09.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57560 of 2023. He is languishing in judicial custody since 11.05.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 97 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U