Parmeshwari Rishideo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12119 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -827 Year- 2014 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Parmeshwari Rishideo S/o Brijnath Rishideo Resident of Village Pachira, P.S. Raniganj, District - Araria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M.Rahman(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 30-03-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner being the Headmaster of Government Middle School, Pachira is languishing in custody since 13.12.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged that the petitioner submitted two conflicting reports dated 21.07.2012 and 24.07.2012 with regard to entry of the name of Raghu Paswan in the School Admission Register as one report suggested that the name of Raghu Paswan is not mentioned in the admission register while the other report suggests that the name of Raghu Paswan is mentioned at Serial No. 68.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12119 of 2015 (02) dt.30-03-2015 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that specific query was made whether name of Raghu Panswan was entered at serial no. 148 or not and since at serial no.148 his name was not entered in the admission register the petitioner reported about the same, but subsequently in pursuance to another query second report was transmitted that the name of Raghu Paswan was entered at 68. Hence, the conflicting reports were transmitted due to specific query whether the name of Raghu Paswan is recorded at serial no. 148 of admission register or not. Hence, considering the two reports in pursuance to two different queries cannot be treated as conflicting.

Considering the nature of accusation, period under custody and the fact that the investigation has already concluded, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 827 of 2014.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T