Mirtunjay Ram @ Mirtunjay Kumar Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45777 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2018 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ======================================================

1. Mirtunjay Ram @ Mirtunjay Kumar Ram, S/o Harendra Ram,

2. Harendra Ram S/o Late Jagdeo Ram, Both R/o Vill.- Gheghta Sherpur, P.S.- Chapra, Muffasil, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Chapra Muffasil P.S. case no. 196 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s)304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are brother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased. In the written report, there is allegation that medicine was prescribed to the daughter of informant who was pregnant due to which bleeding took place and she died.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that husband of the deceased is already in custody.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45777 of 2018(2) dt.13-08-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. case no. 196 of 2018 , they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T