Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54811/2025bail granted

Ashutosh Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-09Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54811 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2021 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaharsa ====================================================== Ashutosh Mishra, S/O Bipin Kumar Mishra R/O Village- Ramdiri, P.SMatihani, Distt.- Begusarai, Bihar. Also residing at Quarter No. T2/4, Teacher's Colony, Central School, P.S- Ramgarh, Distt.- Ramgarh, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Nidhi Mishra W/O Ashutosh Mishra, D/O Sri Mohit Mishra R/O VillageSah Colony, Patratu, P.S- Patratu, Dist.- Ramgarh. Permanent Address R/O Kendriya Vidyalaya, Ramgarh Cantt., P.S- Ramgarh, Distt.- Ramgarh. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Shaheen Begum- A.P.P.

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Mr.Priya Ranjan Mr.Sudeep Kumar Mr.Anunay Shahi Mr.Nitish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the D. P. Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case was referred for mediation by an order dated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54811 of 2025(4) dt.09-02-2026 2/3 17.10.2025. It is next submitted that mediation was successful and the parties have compromised. It is also submitted that before the learned Mediator, it was also agreed that both petitioner and the opposite party no.2 shall withdraw the cases filed by them against each other. It is next submitted that in terms of the agreement, the petitioner has filed an application seeking withdrawal of the case, but then, a day later then what was agreed before the learned Mediator. It is also submitted that since the dispute has been resolved amicably, as such, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to jail.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2 also does not dispute the said submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the mediation was successful and parties have resolved their dispute amicably.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54811 of 2025(4) dt.09-02-2026 3/3 with Complaint Case No.54(C) of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

6. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T