Dipak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46301 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2018 Thana -JEHANABAD RAIL P.S. District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Dipak Kumar Son of Late Devpati Chaudhary Resident of Village + P.O. - Sanda, Police Station - Dhanarua, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with G.R.P. Jehanabad (Taregana) P.S. Case No. 29 of 2018, registered for offence punishable under Section 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be the husband of the informant, is of misbehaving with the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that a large number of cases have been filed by the informant against the petitioner but the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is no cogent materials available in case diary to show the involvement of the petitioner in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46301 of 2018 (2) dt.09-08-2018 2/2 this case, rather the co-accused namely, Prince Raj @ Golu involved in this case.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate-cum- A.C.J.M. Patna, in connection with G.R.P. Jehanabad (Taregana) P.S. Case No. 29 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/-sunil U T