Bipin Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55830 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2021 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaharsa ====================================================== 1.
Bipin Kumar Mishra S/o- Sachchidanand Mishra Village- Ramdiri PoLabharchak Ps- Matihani Dist- Begusarai, R/o- Q.No- T2/4, Teachers Colony Central School Ps- Ramgarh Dist- Ramgarh Jharkhand 2.
Kiran Mishra W/o- Bipin Kumar Mishra Village- Ramdiri Po- Labharchak Ps- Matihani Dist- Begusarai, R/o- Q.No- T2/4, Teachers Colony Central School Ps- Ramgarh Dist- Ramgarh Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Nidhi Mishra @ Nidhi Kumari W/o- Ashutosh Mishra, D/o- Sri Mohit Mishra Village- SAh Colony Patratu Ps- Patratu Dist- Ramgarh, P/A- K.V School Ramgarh Cantt Ps- Ramgarh Dist- Ramgarh ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have falsely been implicated in the instant case by the complainant being father-in-law and mother-in-law. It is also submitted that husband of the complainant has approached this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55830 of 2025(2) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.54811 of 2025 in which notices have been issued to O.P. No.2. It is next submitted that whenever such dispute arises in between the husband and the wife, false case alleging torture for dowry demand is instituted implicating all the family members in a mechanical manner.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the fact that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law, let petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 54c/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T