Professor Dr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2688 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1377 of 2024 ====================================================== Professor Dr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra Son of Late Rajendra Prasad Mishra, Resident of Village- Ramjee Chak, P.O. - Bata Ganj, Police Station - Digha, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Bihar State Housing Board Patna through its Chairman, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna - 800105.

3.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna - 800015.

4.

The Revenue Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna - 800015.

5.

The Estate Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna - 800015.

6.

The Chief Account Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna - 800015.

7.

The Executive Engineer, Division - 2, Bahadurpur, Bihar State Housing Board, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna - 800020.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the BSHB :

Mr.Pawan Kumar, Adv.

Mr.Sudhir Kr. Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 18 Mr.Vivekanand Singh, AC to GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 21-02-2025

1. The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 1377 of 2024, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 15.07.2024.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court MJC No.2688 of 2024(3) dt.21-02-2025 2/2 that since the counsel for the petitioner was engaged in another Court, he could not appear when the case was called out for hearing, hence, the aforesaid writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 1377 of 2024 to its original file.

4. The present petition stands allowed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U