← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2108/2013dismissed

Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-26Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2108 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5327 of 2012 ====================================================== Vinay Kumar Son Of Late Praduman Singh Resident Of Village- New Basti Mahdeva, P.S. Mahdeva, District- Siwan, The Retired Junior Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Sri S.K. Negi Son Of Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Alok Kumar Son Of Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As The Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

4. Sri Rajeshwar Dayal Son Of Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As The Engineer-In-Chief-Cum-Additional Secretary-CumSpecial Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

5. Sri Guja Lal Ram Son Of Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As The Chief Engineer (North), Water Resources Department, Muzaffarpur

6. Sri Pawan Kumar Ram Son Of Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Gopalganj

7. Sri I.D.S. Dhaliwal Son Of Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna

8. Manoj Kumar, District Provident Fund Officer, Gopalganj .... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. V.K.Singh, Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates For Acct. General : Mr. R.K.Priyadarshi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kr. Verma, JC to AAG-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2016 In the third supplementary show cause filed today on behalf of the opposite party no. 8, it is stated that authority slip for statutory interest for the remaining period has

Patna High Court MJC No.2108 of 2013 (9) dt.26-10-2016 2/2 been issued on 22.10.2016 for an amount of Rs. 1,26,186/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid position but states that payment has not yet been made. It is expected that since the authority has already been issued the payment shall be made expeditiously. With the aforesaid observations, the contempt application is dismissed.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) S.Pandey/- U