Ganesh Ram @ Nanhey @ Nanhe Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59461 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2023 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Ganesh Ram @ Nanhey @ Nanhe Ram Son of Late Babulal Ram Resident of Village- Hahawa, P.S.- Maharajganj, Dist.- Siwan. 2.

Suganti Devi @ Dharmavati Devi @ Dharmawati Devi Wife of Ganesh Ram @ Nanhey Resident of Village- Hahawa, P.S.- Maharajganj, Dist.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 304(B)/ 34 of IPC. 3.

Allegedly, the petitioners are in-laws of the deceased. Petitioners along with other co-accused persons have tortured the daughter of the informant over demand of chain. They also killed the informant's daughter by putting duppatta around her neck and throw her body with intention to conceal the body. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59461 of 2024(3) dt.20-11-2024 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners are not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that husband of the deceased was arrested by the police but police has not filed charge-sheet and he has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and since there is no specific overt act attributed against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No.247 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T