Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45668/2017bail granted

Pankaj Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45668 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45668 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -277 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Pankaj Yadav

2. Purushuttam Kumar

3. Gauri Shankar @ Gauri Shankar Yadav

4. Amarjeet Yadav .... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with C2 Case No. 277 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of about 1 litre of foreign liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have no criminal antecedents Moreover, they have sufficiently been punished for the said offence as they are in judicial custody since 29.07.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners has no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45668 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge- Cum-Secial Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai, in connection with C2 Case No. 277 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T