Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45774/2017bail granted

Murari Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45774 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45774 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -89 Year- 2016 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Murari Kumar Son of Sri Dinesh Singh, R/o Haspur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 89 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A)(F) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 101 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 31.07.2017 and other co-accused of this case has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.07.2017 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 18366 of 2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45774 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 circumstances of the case and as other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court, as such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -1st Jamui, in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 89 of 2016.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T