Tarachand Rishidev v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40697 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA P.S District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Tarachand Rishidev, son of Bindi Rishidev @ Vindeshwari Rishidev, R/o Village- Machaha, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Supaul Mahila P.S. Case No. 79 of 2016, arising out of POCSO Case No. 24 of 2016/32 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 4/6 of POCSO Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of commission of rape upon five years daughter of informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to family dispute he has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 6.8.2016.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that in this case charge has already been framed and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40697 of 2017 (3) dt.06-09-2017 2/2 trial has commenced.

Having heard both sides and in view of facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of nine months. With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U