Mumtaz Mian v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7985 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -148 Year- 2013 Thana -KALYANPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Mumtaz Mian s/o Vakil Mian resident of village- Basdeopur Sarai. P.S. Sahebganj, District Muzaffarpur at present residing- Mananpur, P.S.- Kalyanpur, Distt- East Champaran, .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sangita Sharma (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 04-08-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 302, 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The petitioner killed his wife by strangulating her. Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2013, giving rise to Sessions Trial No. 667 of 2014 pending in the court of the learned 10th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari. This application for bail is, accordingly, rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7985 of 2015 (4) dt.04-08-2015 The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within the time aforesaid, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail firstly in the trial court.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Amin/- U