← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36109/2017bail granted

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-10Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36109 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2016 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav, S/o Suresh Yadav, resident of village, Sekhpur also Known as Sekhpura, P.S.- Serghati, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lilawati Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. MD. FAHIMUDDIN ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is contended that, as per allegation, about 140 litres of country made liquor, equipment for preparation of wine were recovered from the agricultural field of Ranjit Kumar Yadav. It is further contended that when petitioner surrendered in another

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36109 of 2017(2) dt.10-08-2017 2/3 case, he has been remanded in the present case also. Petitioner is in custody since 19.06.2017.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the abovenamed petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 76/2016.

Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in similar nature of case then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bond.

That apart, in view of the antecedents of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Gaya within fieen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereaier for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. Aier reporting to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36109 of 2017(2) dt.10-08-2017 3/3 Superintendent of Police, a certifcate will be fled by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police upon his appearance. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Sanjay/- U T