Pappu Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27786 of 2016 (2) dt.13-07-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27786 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2015 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== Pappu Thakur, Son of Ram Kishor Thakur, resident of Village - Sahpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Begusarai (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 200 of 2015 registered under Sections 302/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that petitioner, who was in custody in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 197 of 2014 in respect to attempt of murder of son of informant, Ashok Kumar Thakur, conspired to other named accused for committing murder of informant. On 10.06.2015, when informant moved from his house in morning along with Kumud Thakur then Rahul Thakur, Rohit Thakur Rikkey Singh and Haudu Singh surrounded the informant

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27786 of 2016 (2) dt.13-07-2016 in the way where Raj Kishore Thakur was present and on his order to the effect that the petitioner has ordered for murder all fired in which Kumud Thakur sustained firearm injury and died on spot while informant succeeded to flee away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that at the time occurrence petitioner was in jail custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 563 of 2014 arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 197 of 2014 regarding the attempt of murder of the son of the informant but due to ulterior motive petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case by the informant.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Begusarai, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 200 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T