Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46444/2018bail granted

Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46444 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2018 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Guddu Kumar, Son of Nand Kishor Sahani, resident of village- Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Bagaha, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastriji, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with I.F. Case No. 55 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 33, 41, 42 of the Indian Forest Act and Sections 5, 7, 9 and 10 S.M.P. Act.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is running a shop without any valid license. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the petitioner had a valid lenience, which was registered from Districts Industries Department, Bettiah. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46444 of 2018 (2) dt.10-08-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with I.F. Case No. 55 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/-sunil U T