Radha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54532 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2025 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== Radha Devi w/o - Sanjay Soni @ Sanjay Saw R/o vill - Maner Hudda par Pathan Toli, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rudal Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 86, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his daughter was married to Golu about four years back and out of wedlock, a child was born, further the petitioner used to torture her for which a complaint was earlier made to Maner Police Station, but then the issue was settled, further on 18-2-2025, the petitioner tried to strangulate his daughter, on account of which she became unconscious, on regaining consciousness, the victim called the informant when he reached the place of occurrence and brought her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54532 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 to P.H.C, further at the time of occurrence her Dewar was in the house.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, being mother-in-law, has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that husband of the victim has not been made an accused. It is further submitted that petitioner and her younger son have been made an accused only to coerce them into submission so that they part with property. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 149 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T