Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48377/2017bail granted

Krishna Sah @ Bontha v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48377 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48377 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2017 Thana -HAZIPUR INDUSTRIAL DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Krishna Sah @ Bontha, Son of Prem Sah, Resident of Village- Karnpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Dist- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hajipur Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 50 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30/47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 3.6 litres of foreign liquor and on confession of arrested person further 72 litres of foreign liquor was recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has not been arrested on spot and has nothing to do with the alleged recovery, his name has been disclosed by co-accused of this case. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 28.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48377 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 50 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T