Parvej Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63089 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2023 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== Parvej Alam S/O Abdul Hafiz R/o Vill - Panchpatiya, P.S.- Awtar Nagar, Distt. - Saran (Chapra) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with AWTAR NAGAR (AUTAR NAGAR) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 323, 307, 325, 354(B), 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused person assaulted the informant side and also tried to outrage the modesty of mother of informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is specific allegation on the petitioner that he assaulted the informant with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63089 of 2023(2) dt.19-10-2023 2/2 iron rod on his head, nature of injury of informant is found grievous in nature as mentioned in annexure-3 and father of informant also sustain injury, nature of injury is simple in nature as mentioned in annexure-4. There is a case and counter case between the parties earlier. Thereafter, informant has filed the present case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.
7. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T