Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59580/2024bail granted

Arvind Sah @ Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-19Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59580 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2024 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Arvind Sah @ Arvind Kumar Son of Nandu Sah Resident of VillageManpurwa, Police Station- Madhuban, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Sulita Kumari Sah Wife of Arvind Sah, Daughter of Aklu Sah At present address, R/O Vill.- Porma Bengala Tola, P.S.- Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhannjay Kumar No 2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Tr. no. 2003 of 2024, arising out of Complaint Case no. 179 of 2024, registered under sections 498A, 323 and 504 of Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the complainant states that she was married to the petitioner on 14.5.2022 and various articles as given in detail in the complaint were given at the time of marriage. It is further stated that soon after the marriage, the accused persons started to torture and assault her for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59580 of 2024(2) dt.19-09-2024 2/3 non-fulfillment of further demand of Rs. 2 lacs and a motorcycle. She was abused, assaulted and forced out of the house in June, 2023 and since then, she has been living with her parents.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only for the reason that he happens to be the husband of the complainant. The allegations are false and concocted. There is no explanation for the inordinate delay in lodging of the complaint. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the complaint, the material on record, the delay in filing of the complaint together with the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Tr. no. 2003 of 2024 (arising out of Complaint Case no. 179 of 2024) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59580 of 2024(2) dt.19-09-2024 3/3 Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T