Malti Rai And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4966 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5085 of 2008 ======================================================

1. Malti Rai Daughter Of Raja Ram Roy Resident Of Village Post OfficePaharpur, P.S.- Jurawanpur Raghopur, District- Vaishali, Block Physical Teacher, Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya Paharpur Raghopur, District- Vaishali.

2. Lav Kuamr Raushan Son Of Upendra Roy Resident Of VillageKhajpura, Post - Khapur Pakri, P.S.- Bidupur, District-Vaishali Block Physical Teacher, Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Tatma Town Raghopur, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Sri Amarjit Sinha, Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri A.K. Choudhary, Director, Primary Education, Govt. Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. Sri Sanghmitra Verma, District Programme Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali.

5. Sri Shashi Bhushan Rai, Block Development Officer, Raghopur Block, District- Vaishali.

6. Sri Yogendra Prasad Singh, Block Education Extension Officer Raghopur Block, District- Vaishali.

7. Sri Rajesh Chaudhary, Acting Head Master, Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Paharpur Raghopur, District- Vaishali.

8. Sri Kamaldeo Naraian Bhagat, Acting Head Master, Rajkiya Madhya Vidalaya, Pahrpur Tatma Toli, Raghopur, District- Vaishali. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Prasad Sinha, A.C to G.A. 13.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this application, while learned counsel A.C. to G.A. 13 submits that in compliance of order under contempt, the dues of salary of the petitioners have already been paid, which would appear

Patna High Court MJC No.4966 of 2013 (6) dt.04-02-2015 2/2 from the paragraph no. 9 of the show cause and paragraph no. 4 of the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.6.

In view of the above submission, since the order under contempt has been complied with, no further action is required to taken in this case. Accordingly, this application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Shail/- U