Pappu Chaudhary @ Randhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65689 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-164 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== PAPPU CHAUDHARY @ RANDHIR KUMAR Son of Sakal Sahani @ Sakal Chaudhary Resident of Village - Hathiyahi, P.S.- Piprakothi, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2022 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 164 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under section 272 and 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65689 of 2021(2) dt.29-04-2022 2/2 Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named accused and there is recovery of illicit liquor from his house. Petitioner, therefore, does not deserve to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.

mcv/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T