Navin Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37670 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2014 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictMADHUBANI ====================================================== Navin Thakur, son of late Vishwanath Thakur, resident of Baruar, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate.

For the O.P/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kr. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the nature of allegation against the petitioner for offence under Section 47(a) of the Excise Act and this is the first episode of the petitioner inasmuch as he has got no criminal antecedent, this Court would direct that if the petitioner namely, Navin Thakur surrenders before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with G.O. Case No. 18 of 2014, subject to the following conditions:

(i) That both the bailors will be close family relatives of the petitioner, who will undertake an affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37670 of 2014 (2) dt.09-04-2015 2/2 the petitioner. The bailors will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail.

(iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned, if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of his bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date in course of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U