Chunnu Kumar @ Channu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34316 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSITAMARHI ====================================================== CHUNNU KUMAR @ CHANNU KUMAR Son of Late Nagendra Das, Resident of Village- Bathnaha, Choudhary Tola, P.S.- Bathnaha, DistrictSitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with G.O. 81 of 2017/96 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(A) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 9 litres of Nepali wine from the possession of the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody for about three months. Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34316 of 2017 (2) dt.27-07-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the I/c Additional Sessions Judge-II-cumSpecial Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi, in connection with G.O. 81 of 2017/96 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U