Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39408/2014bail granted

Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-02Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39408 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2014 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Arvind Kumar son of Upendra Sah, resident of village- Runni Saidpur, P.S.- Runni Saidpur, District- Sitamarhi, A/P- Training College, Sheohar, P.S.- Sheohar, District- Sheohar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradip Nr.Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 02-02-2015 A supplementary affidavit has been filed today. Let it be kept on record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 364/34 of IPC. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is a mentally weak person and his treatment is going on. The alleged victim Niraj Kumar has returned on the same day of the occurrence. After investigation the police has found the case under Sections 341, 342, 345, 506 IPC and also filed a petition to amend charge against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 9.6.2014 having no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39408 of 2014 (3) dt.02-02-2015 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar/court concerned in Sheohar P. S. Case No. 104 of 2014 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T