Vinod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55476 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2025 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Vinod Yadav S/o Shivdahin Yadav Resident Of Village- Shahpur, PsParasbigha, Dist- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025

1. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case no.112 of 2025 registered under Section 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S Act, 2023.

3. Allegation in the F.I.R is that informant's daughter has been done to death on account of non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55476 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 2/3 general and omnibus allegation leveled against him in the F.I.R with regard to demand of dowry. The petitioner is also staying separate in residence and mess from his son and the deceased. He further submits that the deceased had committed suicide on account of some matrimonial dispute. Learned counsel has specifically stated in paragraph no.21 of his petition that husband of the deceased, who is primarily responsible for welfare of his wife, is in custody since 24.07.2025 and motherin-law of the deceased has been granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.55460. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 01.06.2025 and undertakes to co-operate in trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts of the case and considering the fact that petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased, he is in custody since 01.06.2025, husband of the deceased, who is primarily responsible for welfare of his wife is also in custody since 24.07.2025 as also mother-in-law of the deceased has been granted anticipatory bail by the aforementioned order, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case no.112 of 2025

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55476 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 3/3 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor Court.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T