Khedan Yadav @ Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48675 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2017 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Khedan Yadav @ Ranjit Yadav S/o Darvesh Yadav, R/o VillageKelhanpur, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rana Baljit Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2017 in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 152 of 2017 for the offence registered under Sections 302, 201/34 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the fact that the petitioner's name has surfaced in connection with the present case on the basis of the confessional statement made by the FIR named accused, which has no evidentiary value and also because the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 152 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48675 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 1.

That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

2.

That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offences till conclusion of the trial.

3.

That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

4.

The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T