Vinay Singh @ Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57402 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-443 Year-2022 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== VINAY SINGH @ VINAY KUMAR SON OF CHANDARIK SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DUMDUMA, PS- VAISHALI, DISTTVAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 31-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioner is the co-villager of the co-accused Pramod Kumar Singh (husband of the deceased). He submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57402 of 2023(2) dt.31-08-2023 2/2 that the petitioner has no concern with mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband and also he lives separately from them. He further submitted that the other co-accused have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 07.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25371 of 2023. He is languishing in judicial custody since 19.04.2023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 443 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U