Sanjay Mahto @ Sanjay Mehta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38636 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2016 Thana- MALI District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sanjay Mahto @ Sanjay Mehta S/o Sri Ramesh Mahto Resident of Village : - New Sidhouli Dalmia Nagar, P.O. Dalmianagar, P.S. - Dehri (Dalmia Nagar), District - Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhaneshwar prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. RAJENDRA PRASAD NAT ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 47/54 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
It is contended that, as per allegation, 168 litres of country-made liquor were recovered from a vehicle. Petitioner claims to be the driver of the said vehicle. It is urged that the petitioner is in custody since 14.6.2017.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge II - cum - Special Judge, Excise Act, Aurangabad in connection with Mali P.S. Case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38636 of 2017(2) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 No. 48/2016.
If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.
That apart, in view of the antecedent of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T