Lal Babu Sahni @ Lalbabu Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49577 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -31 Year- 2017 Thana -HAYAGHAT District- DARBHANGA ======================================================
1. LAL BABU SAHNI @ LALBABU SAHNI, son of Sri Bhukhal Sahni @ Chukhal Sahni, resident of Village- Manortha, P.S.- Ashok Paper Mill, District- Darbhanga.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hayaghat P.S.Case No.31 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the minor girl of the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the girl in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has not supported the prosecution case. Further submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 7.7.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49577 of 2017 (3) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-V, Darbhanga in connection with Hayaghat P.S.Case no.31 of 2017 dated 7.6.2017. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T