Sangita Devi @ Sangita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66183 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-411 Year-2021 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

SANGITA DEVI @ SANGITA KUMARI Wife of Sunil Kumar Resident of Village - Ajwan, P.S.- Rupaspur, District - Patna. 2.

Sunil @ Anil Kumar Son of Mundrik Chaudhary Resident of Village - Ajwan, P.S.- Rupaspur, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case no. 411 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 304-B, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with his family members have tortured in various ways due to nonfulfillment dowry demand and ultimately they killed her. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are sister-in-law and brother-inlaw of the informant and have been falsely implicated in this case. They have never demanded any thing from the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66183 of 2021(2) dt.01-04-2022 2/2 They have no concern with the daily activity of the deceased and her husband. Petitioners are living separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband of the deceased and not against his family members. Husband of the deceased is in custody.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case no. 411 of 2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur, Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U