Paplu Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58684 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2019 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== PAPLU RAY Son of Ganesh Ray Resident of Village - Ukni, P.S. and Distt - Sheohar ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor For the Informant : Anuj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a series of litigation between the parties, admittedly there is land dispute and the allegations are general and omnibus against the petitioner. Injuries have been found to be simple in nature. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in Sheohar Police Station Case No. 94 of 2019, on the following

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58684 of 2019(3) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tempers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T