Bishnudeo Yadav @ Buchay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58386 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2008 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Bishnudeo Yadav @ Buchay Yadav S/o Kailu Yadav R/o Village- Daprakha, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 119 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 668 of 2008 S.T. No. 61 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 & 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others have assaulted the informant and his father.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner is only the member of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58386 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 the mob. No overt act is alleged against him. Even in the second part of the FIR, no weapon has been attributed to him. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 31.12.2024.

5. Learned counsel for the APP conceded to the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is only a member of the mob.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 119 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 668 of 2008/ S.T. No. 61 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T