Sanni Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36113 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -170 Year- 2017 Thana -ALAMGANJ District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Sanni Kumar, Son of Sujeet Kumar @ Sujit Prasad, a resident of Bhawar Pokhar, Police Station- Pirbahore, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2017 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Alamganj P.S.Case No.170 of 2017 , registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The case is under Section 302 of the IPC and allegation is that in a function in course of dance, the petitioner fired causing injury to the son of the informant due to which he died and thereafter they tried to disappear the dead-body.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no eye witness of the occurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36113 of 2017 (3) dt.30-08-2017 2/2 he is in custody since 10.5.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that he is named in the F.I.R. though the informant and other witnesses are not eye witness but they have named in this petitioner as the person who has fired and the confessional statement of this petitioner as well as other accused persons also shows that he is assailant.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T