Tajudin Khan Alias Tajadin Khan Alias Tajdin Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65516 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2020 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== TAJUDIN KHAN ALIAS TAJADIN KHAN ALIAS TAJDIN KHAN, son of Harun Khan, resident of village-Pakhnaha Bazar, Ward No.6, P.S.-Bairiya, District-West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raja Ram Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No. 79/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 376(D), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Petitioner is husband of opposite party no.2 and both parties are ready to settle the dispute.

Without going into the merits of the matter, let the petitioner above named be released on provisional bail for a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order to the court concerned on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65516 of 2021(3) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-1, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No. 79/2020.

The court below is directed to make suitable effort for the purpose of conciliation between the parties. The petitioner and the opposite party no.2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue. If the Court below finds that Opposite Party No.2 is not cooperating in the amicable settlement to the matrimonial dispute, in that context, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional bail.

If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties. The Court below, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioner's provisional bail.

This application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T